The name of this blog is Pink’s Politics. The name comes from my high school nick-name “Pink” which was based on my then last name. That is the only significance of the word “pink” here and anyone who attempts to add further or political meaning to it is just plain wrong.

Monday, September 25, 2017

Why is everything just a vehicle for expressing hatred of President Trump?

I really thought that by now the majority of the country would have returned to at least a semblance of sanity.  But, silly me, the irrational hatred that began the day after the election last November continues at full throttle.  It stifles any hope for rational and productive dialog.

I will get to the NFL taking a knee in a moment, but let’s just consider a few other things first.  For example, Sunday evening CBS aired its new Star Trek spinoff.  I watched the show, and, as a lifelong “trekkie” was pretty disappointed: I felt that it did not live up to the quality, story line, characters, or overall depth of its predecessor series.  I made the decision that it was not worth paying CBS for its “all access TV” in order to watch any further episodes.  Then, the next day I discover that immediately following its airing the cast all “took a knee” to show their solidarity with those expressing disagreement with Trump.  Bad enough, but then they go on to tell us that the entire series will cast the Klingons in a negative light as a clear analogy to Trump.  Really?  Gene Roddenberry must be turning over in his grave.  That taking of sides, of making the show a political mouthpiece is so anti everything that Star Trek stands for.  Yes, Star Trek always dealt with current and difficult issues.  But it presented its stories in a way that makes people think about those issues, not as simply a mouthpiece for a particular side.  But now, apparently, this new version, like so many other TV shows and movies, is simply a vehicle for expressing hatred of President Trump.

Now, as to the NFL “take a knee” controversy.  When Colin Kaepernick did this last year he asserted that he was making a point about inequality in the U.S.  I happen to disagree with the manner in which he chose to make his statement, but it was his statement and it had a purpose – to raise awareness about the inequality that he perceived as needing to be addressed.  Very few joined him until President Trump strongly objected this past weekend to players disrespecting the flag, the National anthem, and the country.  Now scores of people take a knee – their purpose simply to express their hatred of Trump.  Among the social media posts we see photos of Martin Luther King Jr. praying on knee at a Selma march and are told that Trump has objected to this.  Trump did not object to all protest, to taking a knee generally.  What he objected to was NFL players taking a knee stating that they are against our flag or our anthem.  He objects to disrespect of our country as do I and as do many Americans and, he too has a free speech right to make that objection (and, perhaps as the President he has a duty to speak out in defense of our flag and the country that it stands for).  In the Civil Rights, Anti-war, and other protests of the 50s and 60s to which many try to analogize today’s protests, few if any asserted a disrespect let alone a hatred of our country.  They asserted that there exist inequalities and things that need to be corrected while still being proud to live within a country where that could occur.  There is a difference between standing (or taking a knee) for a clear cause and doing so as a statement of hatred either for a country or, as is more likely today, of hatred for Trump.

As an aside, it is interesting that the NFL disallowed protests by its players designed to honor police officers who had been killed or victims of 911 or other social causes.  There was no uproar about any of that, no full teams with owners on the field.  But then, those were real issues, as was the issue behind Kaepernick’s original actions.  The current taking of the knee is a protest without a cause; it is simply another vehicle for expressing the hatred of President Trump.

Then there is the new travel ban.  It includes N. Korea and Venezuela, clearly not majority Muslim countries and excludes countries that are majority Muslim such as Saudi Arabia.  The selected countries were chosen in large part because their governments will not provide information that is necessary to background checking those who seek entry to our country.  Nonetheless, I heard interviews on the news today in which interviewees asserted that the new ban should still be challenged as racist and anti-Muslim because “we know Trump is anti-Muslim and that is the real purpose of the ban.”  Here is another vehicle for simply expressing hatred of President Trump.  Other recent stories led to assertions that Trump is worse than the leader of N. Korea, that he hates [fill in the blank], that he wants to hurt/destroy [fill in the blank], etc.  Then there are the attacks on such trivial things as the food he eats or the clothes his wife wears.  I am hard pressed to find anything that is not some sort of vehicle for hatred of President Trump.

Everyday every potential news story is turned into a way to express vitriolic hatred of Trump.  This hatred is often based on no facts whatsoever but rather on unfounded interpretations and characterizations that simply fit and support the hater’s hate.  And, because it is built out of hatred rather than evidence, it is nearly impossible to have a rational dialog about the underpinnings of the belief.  This is abundantly clear to me whenever I decide to ask someone reciting a litany of hate on what piece of evidence, what fact, they base a particular assertion.  Despite their having no answer, no evidence to support their hate and vitriolic name calling, they continue to assert that their hate and hateful labels are accurate and that those who do not accept this are either stupid or some form of bigot.  And the likely response when this occurs is to hate the hater.  So the hate goes on and the divisions in the country become more and more solidified. 

Rather than talk, people avoid any attempt at discussion and dialog or examination of differing views.  And the voices and messages of hate surround us.  I understand that people dislike the President for a variety of reasons.   But the vitriolic hatred that daily spews forth from so many is not rational or healthy.  It is being fed by the news and by the entertainment media and by the haters themselves until the entire country becomes completely entranced by this siren song.  The whole country seems to be a churning whirlpool from which there is no escape and the only voice is just a louder and louder scream of hate.

This must stop!

But, like most any problem, the first step to recovery is the acknowledgment that there is a problem and the desire to recover.  People must examine their hatred and face the fact that much of it is irrational.  They cannot blame this hatred on the President or anyone else – they must look within and examine the facts:  what supports their feelings and what feelings are simply the creation of their hate.  Everything the President says or does is not a cause for hysteria and while some may not like him as a person or disagree with some of his policies or actions, or simply wish he had lost the election, President Trump is not evil personified or the cause of every trouble of every individual or group or of the world.  People must ignore the siren song and realize that the best way to escape this whirlpool of hate is to rationally consider what the facts do and do not support along with the broader ramifications and pros and cons of differing positions and actions.  Each individual must focus their own understandings, issues, and protests.  Only with that beginning will we ever be able to arrive at rational discussions about the issues that divide our country.  Only then will our voices not be just another vehicle for hate.  I thought it would have happened by now, but it really is time that the country come to its senses and rationally address its problems.


No comments:

Post a Comment