The name of this blog is Pink’s Politics. The name comes from my high school nick-name “Pink” which was based on my then last name. That is the only significance of the word “pink” here and anyone who attempts to add further or political meaning to it is just plain wrong.

Showing posts with label 2021. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2021. Show all posts

Monday, January 4, 2021

Democracy May Involve Disorder and Disruption but It Requires Dependable Integrity

Do I think the objections to the Electoral Vote certification will succeed? No.
Do I think that the objections should nonetheless be made? Yes, absolutely.

Some may question my answers above, but if one takes a step back from their feelings for or against President Trump and looks at this past election more objectively, anyone who cares about our American democracy must agree.

There is no question that there was a much higher number of ballot irregularities in this election than the few that occur in every election.  In some cases, the numbers were huge enough that they could have changed (though there is no proof, nor may there ever be any, that they did or did not change) the outcome of not only the presidential result but results of other contests on the ballot as well.

If there is any possibility that fraud or other lack of integrity allowed illegal votes to be cast and counted, then those votes diluted the votes of those who cast legal ballots, thus disenfranchising those legal voters just as if their valid votes had not been counted.  This should concern everyone of us who enjoys the benefits of our democracy.

A number of senators, led by Ted Cruz, will object on Wednesday to results from specific states.  Their joint statement indicates that they will vote against accepting the election results until there is a 10-day audit:

Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission’s findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.

Will this divide the country?  Perhaps, but probably no more than it is already divided.  Will it cause some anger and uncertainty during the 10 days if the objection prevails and the proposed Commission is established?  Yes.  But then, uncertainty is a part of democracy.  Only in those nations where a governing body, not the people, makes all decisions is there any kind of certainty.  That certainty may not be pleasant (“This week you will get one loaf of bread and two potatoes”), but the people will know exactly what will happen. 

Democracy does not have certainty, pleasant or unpleasant.  That is because the people have a voice and as that voice changes and evolves, the people will make different choices.  And, because those choices often address if not resolve many opposing viewpoints, then the disruption and disorder they cause become an essential part of the preservation of our democratic freedoms.

Putting aside the turbulence this objection may cause, isn’t it more important that we establish the integrity of our elections when it is those very elections that are a key cornerstone of our democracy?  The trustworthiness of our elections is needed for the people of the nation to accept and support their results as the true voice of the people.  Without that certainty, we no longer have a government of, for, and by the people, and our democracy is in peril.

Today, 39% of Americans believe the 2016 Presidential election was “rigged”; that includes 17 percent of Democrats and 31 percent of independents.  This needs to be addressed.  It affects not only the legitimacy of this election and presidency, but the legitimacy of all future elections as well. 

Ted Cruz said, that dismissing these claims “does real violence to our democratic system. We ought to have a serious, fair process and tribunal to consider these claims, consider them quickly, consider them expeditiously. We can do it in 10 days before the inauguration.”

What is wrong with that?  We have within our democracy a system for objecting to the Electoral vote.  These senators are following that established procedure.  It is not treasonous as Democrats and others who oppose the objections assert.  Indeed, Democrats objected in 2004 and 2016 and were praised by Democratic leadership and the media when they did. Those objections, like the objections to be made by Republicans this Wednesday, were legal and a valid and necessary aspect of our democracy.

The people need to know that they can trust the democratic process, they need to know that only legal votes will be counted and that all such votes will be counted.  Our vote is a great privilege and to weaken or cancel it by allowing even the perception of a lack of voter integrity is one of the most destructive things that can be done to the American people and their democracy. 

I am aware that the fact that this election was about retaining or not retaining President Trump causes many people to lose any objectivity in the matter and forget what the bigger picture of election integrity is all about.  I understand that President Trump’s sometimes abrasive language, which is not missing in his current fight to find the actual and true vote totals, is a trigger for some sort of anger and/or hate in many. 

The cloud that covers so many eyes and minds when President Trump speaks (the cloud sometimes known as “Trump Derangement Syndrome”) was triggered again by the leak of a phone conversation with Georgia’s Secretary of State wherein, amongst his rant about the hundreds of thousands of questionable ballots, President Trump commented that all he needed was 11,780 of those hundreds of thousands to win.  How this could be any kind of criminal act is ludicrous, yet Democrats and Trump-haters are calling for criminal investigations if not the death penalty.

But while for Trump, who may very well have had an election stolen from him, this is primarily about his vote totals, for the rest of us this should be more fundamentally about American democracy.  While we can clearly see the very different consequences for our country that a Trump or Biden presidency would have, hatred of or love for our current president should not remove our focus on the bigger picture. 

While it is unlikely that, even if the objection prevails and a commission investigates, the final election result will change, that does not mean that this objection should not be made.  The Commission it seeks should be granted. 

We the people have a right to know what happened in this election:  how, for example, in some instances there were more votes than voters, or how a precise needed number of votes miraculously appeared in bulk in the middle of the night.  Even if we live with questions about our president for the next four years, we need to know what happened so that we can have faith in the integrity of our future elections.  That trustworthiness is essential to our democracy.


NOTE, the full statement of those senators planning to object to the Electoral vote on Jan. 6 can be found here: LINK     

 

Wednesday, December 30, 2020

TWO THOUGHTS AS THE YEAR TURNS

 



            1.  Let Us Pray

The phrase “Let us pray” is uttered by priests at various points throughout religious services.  It may be an invitation (generally in Western style services) or an imperative (generally Eastern or Orthodox).  Some believe that prayer can become a way of life. 

The phrase is often uttered either at the end of or as a beginning to meaningful words or acts.  Therefore, it seems appropriate to utter them as we are on the cusp of the end of one year and the beginning of a new one; a time of both ending and beginning.

Of course, a natural question might be:  Pray to whom?  And for what? 

As far as “to whom”:  I would suggest that it matters less how one envisions the entity to whom one prays than it does the fact that someone accepts that there is someone or something greater than oneself in which one believes enough to send forth prayers.   I know there can be pushback here from every advocate of every religion (and every associated denomination within) who believes theirs is the one and only true faith.  But let’s remember that there is a difference between man-made religions and true faith in something that is greater than, and all-encompassing of, Mankind.  Beyond this short statement, I will leave it to the philosophers and saints to argue about who the whom in “to whom” is.

That leaves us the second question:  For what shall we pray?  That is an individual problem.  Many will sit down on New Year’s Day and compose a list of resolutions.  Those are generally positive wishes for oneself in the coming year; I’m not sure they are really prayers, but they could be if in the end they are directed to that greater being to whom one prays.

I think that my prayer is for a reinvigoration in this world of the faith that makes prayer meaningful.  This seems to be something that many humans have lost, or are in the process of losing, as individuals seem to become more and more self-absorbed and our world becomes more and more secular.

When one has no belief in something greater than oneself, when the self and its own satisfaction become of primary importance, that is when we lose tolerance for others, when we lose the urge and even the ability to do something for the true good rather than simply for what feels good.  That focus on worldly selves is when we lose respect for humanity and the individuals that surround us.  And it results in an emptiness, a hopelessness, and the anger that we see so much around us in the world these days.

So, my prayer is that we return to our souls and within those souls become reacquainted (or perhaps newly acquainted) with a faith in that which is greater than we, whatever we may choose to call that greater power.  Not only will it lead to truer individual happiness, but it will also go a long way toward healing the world.

2.  The Year You Complain of May Not Really be Over

For all of you who have sent out (sometimes quite offensive) “holiday” cards proclaiming how horrible 2020 was and your eagerness for 2021:  I have some bad news.

We are currently in the Chinese Year of the Metal Rat.  It began last January 25th, just about the exact same time as COVID arrived on our shores (from China).  The year will not end until February 11, 2021.

The Year of Metal Rat comes once every 60 years.  Based in Chinese astrology, the 12 animal astrological symbols are combined with the 5 elemental signs, giving us 60 possibilities, each of which then contains a Yin or a Yang energy.

The Metal Rat is a Yang year.  Yang is an active energy, when the world is shaped through actions and big events, rather than by passive attitudes. It is therefore a year of changes some of which can be drastic. 

The Rat is symbolically a highly active animal; one that is known for being intelligent, curious, and restless. The Rat gets what it wants through tenacity and inventiveness; it is an animal that can also bite, explore the lower realm of our world, and carry illnesses. All those characteristics show up in the Metal Rat year. And the combination of Yang Metal and the Rat makes for a very active year that shakes things up.

This becomes clear when one considers previous Metal Rat Years.  The most recent was 1960-61. Not only did that year begin several years of social upheaval in this country, but it was also the year of a recession, the year that substantial American advisory forces arrived in Viet Nam.  It was a year that saw a strong socialist/communist movement in Europe, it began the transformation of colonialism to independence in Africa, and France detonated its first atomic bomb while other nations including China did so only a few years later.

Going back through history one will find that there were at least a few significant events in each Metal Rat year that caused or helped lead to significant changes in the future.  1900-01 saw widespread application of the internal combustion engine along with several other technological inventions, all of which served to push us full force into the industrial age and change human life forever.

Looking back further, in 1840-41, the World Anti-Slavery commission met for the first time, wagon trains began leaving for California, the Library of Congress was founded, and slavery was ended in the Northwest Territory.  1780-81 brought us to the end of armed conflict in the American Revolution and saw the approval of the Articles of Confederation.  In 1720-21, Tsar Peter the Great ended the Russian-Orthodox patriarchy, peace treaties were signed among several European countries, and Europe’s last major plague outbreak killed around 100,000 people.  1660-61 saw King Charles II sign the Declaration of Breda establishing freedom of religion.  In 1600-01, Astronomers Tycho Brahe and Johannes Kepler met for the first time near Prague, and the first British East India Company voyage departed from London. 1540-41 saw exploration of the New World by the likes of De Soto, Coronado, and Cartier while Michelangelo finished painting “The Last Judgment” in the Sistine Chapel.  The years 1480-81 and 1420-21 saw a number of religious wars play out including Ottoman troops beheading 800 Christians for refusing to convert to Islam,  Pope Martinus I calling for a crusade against the Hussite Protestants, and Jews in Syria and Austria were expelled. 

We could go on, but you get the picture.  Years of the Metal Rat include events that tend to shake up the status quo and are likely to change the course of history.  That does not necessarily make them evil, even though experiencing a Metal Rat year as it is happening may be unpleasant at best. 

But, if we look at the long view, perhaps 2020 or this Metal Rat year is not as malevolent as many now believe it to be.  We should stop and consider what has 2020 taught us, how it has prepared us better for the future and how we can work to make that future better.

But whether it is the Year of the Metal Rat or simply 2020 that is so fashionable to trash, I find it hard to believe that there is not at least one thing that each person can find during the year to be thankful for.  Even in the most difficult times, there is always light to be found.

In conclusion, then, as we sit on this cusp between years, let us search within our souls for the faith that is there that can make prayer real and meaningful.  Let us look to what we have learned from this year that is passing and let us find our many lights within it.  And, for the future, let us pray.