“Credible” means something able to be believed or capable of
persuading people that something did or will happen. It is synonymous with the word “believable”
which means something that is able to be believed.
“Truthful” has a very different definition from “credible.” It means something which expresses the truth.
When a person files a complaint against another alleging
some sort of injury or damages (e.g. someone alleges an injury because the person against whom the complaint is filed ran a red
light), that complaint when filed with the court will be viewed as
credible. Then, facts will be
investigated and the “credible” complaint may or may not be proven to be truthful
(e.g., maybe the facts will show that the light was in fact green, or that
there was no light, or that the light was not working, or that the person
filing the complaint had no injury).
Generally, those facts that prove something initially seen
as credible to be truthful or not will be based on people with actual knowledge
of the event and other direct evidence, and not on third party information.
When the whistleblower complaint was filed about the
President’s phone call with the Ukraine, the allegations were labeled credible. That is, they were able to be believed but
they were not at that time proven to be truthful. The
Democrats have latched onto that word “credible” and keep repeating it over and
over hoping to somehow create the impression that “credible” means that it is
truthful and factually supportable. That
is simply not the case.
When you read the whistleblower complaint it should
immediately strike you that the whistleblower has no direct knowledge of that
about which he is blowing the whistle. While what he alleges is “credible” –
able of being believed, it has not been proven to be truthful. His sources are second and third hand and
even the media.
We now have direct evidence – the actual transcript of the
phone call. HERE That
proves that many of the “credible” allegations about the President’s phone call
are not truthful. There was no quid pro
quo offer made; there was no attempt to interfere with the 2020 election. The President asks if Ukraine could
investigate a variety of things that involve Ukraine and possibly affected the
United States, including interference in the 2016 election and the possibility that
the son of a former Vice President may have received special favors.
One would think that the Democrats, so enamored of never-ending
investigations, would laud the President for seeking to investigate these
issues. But, actually the Democrats only
care about never-ending investigations that might allow them to remove the President
from office – to overturn the will of the people because they don’t agree with
the people’s choice of whom they voted for.
Reality and facts and truthfulness do not matter to the
Democrats. Credible complaints are enough
for them in their war of hatred against the President. We saw it in the Kavanaugh hearings. We see it now. Even with the actual transcript of the phone
call in his hand, Chairman Schiff in his opening statement in the hearing
portrayed the phone call as including things that were not said. Challenged, he and other Democrats now take
the position that we should all know that even though the words are not there,
we should know that they were meant – there is apparently a secret code
involved that only the Democrats understand.
So, we have another show trial underway in which the
Democrats will hear and read and see that which is not there. Anyone who makes allegations that are aimed
against the President or his administration or his supporters will be seen as
not only credible, but also as truthful, whether or not there are actually any
facts to support those allegations. They
don’t care – they continue to grasp at anything in the hopes of ridding
themselves of a president they do not like while at the same time destroying
our country.
The Democrats' attacks on our President hurt both his
administration and all future administrations.
Essentially, they are attacks on the office of president itself and as
such an attack on our country. Take for
example the fact that we have now been made aware of the content of at least three
conversations between President Trump and a foreign leader beginning with his
conversation with the Mexican president at the very start of his term. This must certainly have a chilling effect on
both current and foreign leaders’ willingness to speak openly with the
president. Countries’ leaders need to be
able to speak openly and freely with one another for the good of the entire
world; the Democrats care more about destroying President Trump than they care about the good of this country or the world.
I also find it interesting that the Democrats seem to launch
their new attacks or create a new media circus nearly every time the President
goes abroad or is in some way engaged with foreign leaders. This certainly is an attempt to weaken his position
with any foreign negotiations or other foreign policy matters. Their goal is not concern for our country but an intent to weaken and then destroy the President that they hate.
So, not only would the Democrats subvert the will of the
electorate, they would subvert and destroy the office of president itself if
not the entire executive branch. Think
of this in conjunction with their attacks upon the judiciary and thinly veiled
threats against the Supreme Court to impeach or in other ways change the Court’s
makeup if the Justices render opinions that the Democrats find too
conservative.
There is a hashtag #DemocratsHateAmerica. That title “Democrats Hate America” is a credible statement. Sadly, the actions of the Democrats provide
us with evidence that this credible statement may also be truthful.
