The name of this blog is Pink’s Politics. The name comes from my high school nick-name “Pink” which was based on my then last name. That is the only significance of the word “pink” here and anyone who attempts to add further or political meaning to it is just plain wrong.

Tuesday, June 2, 2020

Co-opting George Floyd – Never let a crisis go to waste.

George Floyd, like so many Blacks and their legitimate grievances before, has become nothing more than a pawn – a tool to be used by others for their own political power agenda.

After my blog post yesterday (LINK)  suggesting more “conversations on race” are not going to change anything and perhaps make things worse, someone asked me “well then, how do we change the system?”  Therein lies a large part of the problem.

I don’t want to, do not think we need to “change the system.”  Improve it, yes – always – but change it? NO.

Change the system to what?  Socialism?  That seems to be the choice of the day.  That would not do anything to address or improve the legitimate grievances of people of color.

And what "system," exactly what aspect of the "system" needs to be changed to such extent that it merits total destruction?

George Floyd was murdered by a police officer.  That officer was arrested and charged with murder.  He will be tried and likely convicted.  Seems to me the system is working.  Yes, Floyd was murdered and that was clearly wrong and a seemingly completely evil act on the part of his murderer.  The system did not kill George Floyd, one man did.  That man will face judgement for his crime.

Not to diminish the horror of Floyd’s murder or the sincere pain it has caused, on the same day he was murdered others across America of all background and color were also murdered.  Some were murdered by friends or family or those of the same race.  Others were murdered by strangers and those of a different race.  Some murders were random; some were personal.  Some may have been committed by individuals wearing uniforms.  The “system” will address these murders too.  There will be investigations, people will be charged and tried.  Our justice system seems to be alive and well.  (Not perfect, there will be errors, but the system is working albeit always open for improvement).

Black Lives Matter demands defunding of the police.  I read this demand as asking for the end of police as we know that term, for if the police are defunded then they will cease to exist.  The BLM petition reads:

Enough is enough. Our pain, our cries, and our need to be seen and heard resonate throughout this entire country. We demand acknowledgment and accountability for the devaluation and dehumanization of Black life at the hands of the police. We call for radical, sustainable solutions that affirm the prosperity of Black lives.

The rhetoric sounds good, but what does it mean, is there really a foundation for this demand, and is it really connected to George Floyd’s death?  Clearly, the pain of Floyd’s death legitimately gives rise to cries of anguish that can and should resonate with us all.  But, the murder by one man who happened to be and should not have been a police officer does not indicate a “devaluation and dehumanization of Black life” at the hands of all police.  That “devaluation and dehumanization” occurred at the hands of one man.  To paint all law enforcement with such an overbroad brush does nothing to improve a system that indeed has allowed a variety of bad actors into its fold.  It simply furthers the hatred toward and implicitly the destruction of the entire system.   This is not going to fix any legitimate grievances that might exist toward that system.

Another “system” that is attacked is the “criminal justice system” which, as the claims go, treats Blacks or people of color differently and worse than Whites.  Clearly, many prisons contain a greater number of people of color.  But it does not necessarily follow from that fact that those people of color are treated less fairly or differently than are Whites.  Life is far more complex than making such a simple jump to such a conclusion.  There are many possible reasons behind the numbers, some of which probably do stem from some sort of unfair or biased treatment but also many others that do not. 

The further implication is that these are “mass incarcerations.”  They are not.  Each was the result of an individual trial that called many “systems” into play.  Not just race, but economics, education, and individual choices are but a few of the many factors that likely affected each of these individual trials.

However, making such simplistic jumps from just one data point – number incarcerated - serves well the purposes of those who do indeed wish to destroy (not simply improve) our systems.  It is a good, strong starting point for fomenting hate from one identity group against another.  That hate does not serve the identity group, but rather the one fomenting the hate, the ones who are not letting this personal crisis go to waste.

Thinking about prison reform, let’s remember that the Left demanded that, told people of color they had to elect them in order to have this problem rectified.  They got the votes but did not make the changes.  It was their hated President Trump who enacted prison reform, something which they fail to note or if they do then they simply argue it was not enough and not soon enough and continue to focus on the problems and destroy the system rather than work toward further improvements to the existing system.

Really the “system” that needs to be changed in the eyes of those who have co-opted Floyd’s murder to their own ends is the system of America itself – its government – its form of Democratic Republic.  Why?  Loss of the freedoms we now hold, loss of the systems that allow us to speak out and to work to improve our society will be destroyed.  That does not help those demanding “change.”  The people that it helps are those who would hold absolute power for themselves.

A former member of Antifa notes that the group uses its anti-fascist name to hide the fact that it is really a conduit for far-Left activism.  This violent group is fighting for Socialism and a part of that fight includes the destruction of America as we know it.  There are other groups and individuals on the far edges of political ideology who believe that America as we know it – the “system” – must be destroyed.  They are more than happy to use moments of racial tension and identity divides to further their cause.  But, be very clear, their cause is not the cause of Black civil rights.  It is not the cause of George Floyd’s family.  It is not the cause of Americans of any color.

The problem here is that we have people who are not thinking.  The Left, the Democrats, the anti-Trumpers, the media all condemn our President for simply enforcing the laws of our country – for supporting our system and our way of life.  Indeed, many would destroy him along with the buildings and the “system.” 

There have always been people who hate America.  There always will be.  But this group, with the help of the media and a lack of solid education in critical thinking (yes, our education system could definitely use improvement), this group of people bent on the very real destruction of America seems to have gained a critical mass.  Using George Floyd’s murder as their match, these people have begun to set America on fire.  They are co-opting the legitimate grievances of sincere people and groups and using them to fan the flames of that fire.  And many, out of lack of understanding about what is going on, are letting themselves be used and are indeed standing by if not encouraging the destruction of our country. 

Some will cheer and say this is a good thing.  I will not.  I do not know which side will win.  But I do know that this hatred, this destructiveness, this lack of respect for all that is not you, this need to have every hurt one suffers blamed upon another who then becomes a target for hatred, revenge, and retribution, this is in large part the result of identity politics. 

It does not look like it today, but we are indeed one America with far more in common than not.  We all know that our form of government is great but not perfect and if we were not urged to perpetuate our hatred we could work together to improve rather than destroy our “system.”  But first we must see people as people.  We must see individuals and not mere cardboard cutout representatives of some group we have been taught to hate. 

And that is the long answer to how I would “change the system.”  I would not.  And I would not let individual issues with our “system” be co-opted for its destruction.  

In essence we need to reset ourselves.  We need to say NO I am not and you are not simply a one dimensional label of one or another identity group.  You are a human being and I am a human being and we each may fit within any number of identity labels, but we are yet more beyond that.  And we will not judge and hate because of some label that is placed upon you or me.  

More importantly, we must not allow others to co-opt our identity and our individuality to fuel the fires of hatred started to further someone else’s power.  We must all proclaim:  I will not destroy but I will work to improve – my life, your life, and the “system.”

                        





Monday, June 1, 2020

Please, not the dreaded DIALOG


As the riots continue to persist, while hopefully dying out, we begin to see calls for “dialog” about race. Letters in the paper: “we need dialog.”  Social media postings: “to move forward there must be an accounting for the past”: “this group needs to accept responsibility for the pain of that group.”   Joe Biden: “I will lead the conversation” (this after he has told us that if you don’t vote for him then you aren’t really Black).  I believe that former President Obama led a few “conversations on race.”

I have been seeing this call for conversation since the 60s.  I spent my young adulthood in Detroit in the late 60s and early 70s.  This was a turbulent time that included the Detroit riots/rebellion.  When it subsided, there were “conversations.”  Back then they were called “consciousness raising.”  They then became “teach ins” that then became “dialogue” which gave rise to “documentaries” and these things continue to become slicker and more political. 

What these conversations have in common is that they focus on the identity of one or more groups rather than individuals who may have that group trait as one of their many own traits.  They put group identity first, individual identity second.  That is, well-intentioned as they are, they will tell us something about the “Black experience” as if every person who is Black experiences the world in the very same way.  This by necessity denies the individuality of individual Black persons.  It in a way makes them less than human.

In a similar way such “conversations” may focus on “White complicity” in injuries to people of color.  Again, while some Whites may be very complicit, others somewhat so, and others not at all, to group all as having an equal and identical history simply because of their Whiteness puts their membership in that identity group above their individuality, again making them less human.

When one focuses on hurt, whether physical or emotional, that hurt and its accompanying pain grows and eventually becomes all encompassing.  People deal with pain in many ways, one way being to hate the cause of the pain.  When we continually place all people with one color identity in one group and continually tell them how a different color identity group has caused them pain, we are certainly likely to create discord if not hate between the two groups.

Is it any wonder that after 50+ years of simplistically defining one group as suffering because of another group that our racial tensions have grown worse rather than better?

Our identity politics have grown far more divisive in the last 10 years or so.  When one is nothing more than a representative of one group or another simply because of their color, what happens is that the individual becomes dehumanized.  It is far easier to hurt a dehumanized being than it is to hurt a three-dimensional human being who shares humanity with you.

Identity politics grows hate.  I realize that many who now begin advocating that we look back and discuss Black pain historically – what it was, who caused it, its repercussions today – have good intentions of helping us to move forward.  But the reality is that this does not help.  Moreover, the product of these good intentions is often co-opted by those who have political ambitions that are furthered by building hatred between groups.

One traditional tool of socialism is to build hatred between the working class and the bosses.  It may allow the socialists to gain power, but that power and that socialism is always destructive, hurting most those whom it promised to help.  It the same way, there are those in this country who use identity politics to build hatred between racial identity groups.  It is simply a tool to their power, to their desire to reform if not totally change our governmental structure.  Like socialism, though it claims to have the best interests of its chosen group at its core, it is likely that group that will end up suffering the most.

The socialists today tell us that this time they will get it right.  Similarly, those who urge dialogs on race assert that this time they will get it right.  They won’t.

If one keeps focusing on a wound it will never heal and the one who is injured will never be able to move forward.  We have been pushing people to see only the bad, focusing on racial wounds in one way or another since the 60s if not before.  And, the recent days show us where that 50+ year focus has gotten us.  It is time to turn around, see every person as an individual first rather than simply a member of one or another identity group.  It is time to face forward and move on.

Talking one on one with your brother – an individual – with his own history, understanding him as an individual, what are his current feelings, beliefs, his goals for the future, and letting him know and understand you – that leads us much further towards a shared humanity than the “lectures” that try to change us by playing with our emotions by presenting us the history or emotions not of an individual but characterized for an entire identity group. 

We will not move forward unless and until we begin seeing a group as only one part of a person’s full identity.  We must stop seeing persons as members of a group first and then as individual second if at all.  Only when we understand that we each one of us has our own separate and very different identity, not only from those who look different but also from those who look the same as us, only then will we truly be able to move forward.

Standing in the way of that forward movement is a constant litany of hurt caused by one group against another.  That group-think, that identity politics, dehumanizes us all.  It pushes us to hate, to demand revenge and retribution.  It puts us in a time warp that not only keeps returning us to the mid-twentieth century, but, even worse, it destroys our individual humanity.

So please, let’s NOT have another conversation.  Not the dreaded dialog.  Let us not fester in festering wounds.  Let us all say that we are more than those wounds whether victim or perpetrator or neither.  Let’s stop the identity politics along with those who would use it only for their own gain.  Let us instead reach for Martin Luther King Jr.’s dream where we see each other not by the color of our skin, but by the content of our character.  Then, and only then, will we end the cycle that I have seen repeated over and over.  Let us understand one another’s individual pain but rather than stall within that pain let us look up and move on.