The name of this blog is Pink’s Politics. The name comes from my high school nick-name “Pink” which was based on my then last name. That is the only significance of the word “pink” here and anyone who attempts to add further or political meaning to it is just plain wrong.

Tuesday, June 2, 2020

Co-opting George Floyd – Never let a crisis go to waste.

George Floyd, like so many Blacks and their legitimate grievances before, has become nothing more than a pawn – a tool to be used by others for their own political power agenda.

After my blog post yesterday (LINK)  suggesting more “conversations on race” are not going to change anything and perhaps make things worse, someone asked me “well then, how do we change the system?”  Therein lies a large part of the problem.

I don’t want to, do not think we need to “change the system.”  Improve it, yes – always – but change it? NO.

Change the system to what?  Socialism?  That seems to be the choice of the day.  That would not do anything to address or improve the legitimate grievances of people of color.

And what "system," exactly what aspect of the "system" needs to be changed to such extent that it merits total destruction?

George Floyd was murdered by a police officer.  That officer was arrested and charged with murder.  He will be tried and likely convicted.  Seems to me the system is working.  Yes, Floyd was murdered and that was clearly wrong and a seemingly completely evil act on the part of his murderer.  The system did not kill George Floyd, one man did.  That man will face judgement for his crime.

Not to diminish the horror of Floyd’s murder or the sincere pain it has caused, on the same day he was murdered others across America of all background and color were also murdered.  Some were murdered by friends or family or those of the same race.  Others were murdered by strangers and those of a different race.  Some murders were random; some were personal.  Some may have been committed by individuals wearing uniforms.  The “system” will address these murders too.  There will be investigations, people will be charged and tried.  Our justice system seems to be alive and well.  (Not perfect, there will be errors, but the system is working albeit always open for improvement).

Black Lives Matter demands defunding of the police.  I read this demand as asking for the end of police as we know that term, for if the police are defunded then they will cease to exist.  The BLM petition reads:

Enough is enough. Our pain, our cries, and our need to be seen and heard resonate throughout this entire country. We demand acknowledgment and accountability for the devaluation and dehumanization of Black life at the hands of the police. We call for radical, sustainable solutions that affirm the prosperity of Black lives.

The rhetoric sounds good, but what does it mean, is there really a foundation for this demand, and is it really connected to George Floyd’s death?  Clearly, the pain of Floyd’s death legitimately gives rise to cries of anguish that can and should resonate with us all.  But, the murder by one man who happened to be and should not have been a police officer does not indicate a “devaluation and dehumanization of Black life” at the hands of all police.  That “devaluation and dehumanization” occurred at the hands of one man.  To paint all law enforcement with such an overbroad brush does nothing to improve a system that indeed has allowed a variety of bad actors into its fold.  It simply furthers the hatred toward and implicitly the destruction of the entire system.   This is not going to fix any legitimate grievances that might exist toward that system.

Another “system” that is attacked is the “criminal justice system” which, as the claims go, treats Blacks or people of color differently and worse than Whites.  Clearly, many prisons contain a greater number of people of color.  But it does not necessarily follow from that fact that those people of color are treated less fairly or differently than are Whites.  Life is far more complex than making such a simple jump to such a conclusion.  There are many possible reasons behind the numbers, some of which probably do stem from some sort of unfair or biased treatment but also many others that do not. 

The further implication is that these are “mass incarcerations.”  They are not.  Each was the result of an individual trial that called many “systems” into play.  Not just race, but economics, education, and individual choices are but a few of the many factors that likely affected each of these individual trials.

However, making such simplistic jumps from just one data point – number incarcerated - serves well the purposes of those who do indeed wish to destroy (not simply improve) our systems.  It is a good, strong starting point for fomenting hate from one identity group against another.  That hate does not serve the identity group, but rather the one fomenting the hate, the ones who are not letting this personal crisis go to waste.

Thinking about prison reform, let’s remember that the Left demanded that, told people of color they had to elect them in order to have this problem rectified.  They got the votes but did not make the changes.  It was their hated President Trump who enacted prison reform, something which they fail to note or if they do then they simply argue it was not enough and not soon enough and continue to focus on the problems and destroy the system rather than work toward further improvements to the existing system.

Really the “system” that needs to be changed in the eyes of those who have co-opted Floyd’s murder to their own ends is the system of America itself – its government – its form of Democratic Republic.  Why?  Loss of the freedoms we now hold, loss of the systems that allow us to speak out and to work to improve our society will be destroyed.  That does not help those demanding “change.”  The people that it helps are those who would hold absolute power for themselves.

A former member of Antifa notes that the group uses its anti-fascist name to hide the fact that it is really a conduit for far-Left activism.  This violent group is fighting for Socialism and a part of that fight includes the destruction of America as we know it.  There are other groups and individuals on the far edges of political ideology who believe that America as we know it – the “system” – must be destroyed.  They are more than happy to use moments of racial tension and identity divides to further their cause.  But, be very clear, their cause is not the cause of Black civil rights.  It is not the cause of George Floyd’s family.  It is not the cause of Americans of any color.

The problem here is that we have people who are not thinking.  The Left, the Democrats, the anti-Trumpers, the media all condemn our President for simply enforcing the laws of our country – for supporting our system and our way of life.  Indeed, many would destroy him along with the buildings and the “system.” 

There have always been people who hate America.  There always will be.  But this group, with the help of the media and a lack of solid education in critical thinking (yes, our education system could definitely use improvement), this group of people bent on the very real destruction of America seems to have gained a critical mass.  Using George Floyd’s murder as their match, these people have begun to set America on fire.  They are co-opting the legitimate grievances of sincere people and groups and using them to fan the flames of that fire.  And many, out of lack of understanding about what is going on, are letting themselves be used and are indeed standing by if not encouraging the destruction of our country. 

Some will cheer and say this is a good thing.  I will not.  I do not know which side will win.  But I do know that this hatred, this destructiveness, this lack of respect for all that is not you, this need to have every hurt one suffers blamed upon another who then becomes a target for hatred, revenge, and retribution, this is in large part the result of identity politics. 

It does not look like it today, but we are indeed one America with far more in common than not.  We all know that our form of government is great but not perfect and if we were not urged to perpetuate our hatred we could work together to improve rather than destroy our “system.”  But first we must see people as people.  We must see individuals and not mere cardboard cutout representatives of some group we have been taught to hate. 

And that is the long answer to how I would “change the system.”  I would not.  And I would not let individual issues with our “system” be co-opted for its destruction.  

In essence we need to reset ourselves.  We need to say NO I am not and you are not simply a one dimensional label of one or another identity group.  You are a human being and I am a human being and we each may fit within any number of identity labels, but we are yet more beyond that.  And we will not judge and hate because of some label that is placed upon you or me.  

More importantly, we must not allow others to co-opt our identity and our individuality to fuel the fires of hatred started to further someone else’s power.  We must all proclaim:  I will not destroy but I will work to improve – my life, your life, and the “system.”

                        





No comments:

Post a Comment