I love Earth Day. I participated
in celebrations on the first Earth Day in 1970.
Since then I have tried to do my part daily for the earth (my cloth
shopping bags are close to 40 years old and still going!). Every year on Earth Day a variety of groups
get together to celebrate this wonderful planet that we call home, to share new
innovations and ways to protect Mother Earth, and to come together as one
people together on one planet. It is always a wonderful day, a day for everyone, a day
that, until now, has not really been politicized.
That is why I am so saddened this year by the March for
Science taking place on Earth Day. I
have nothing against science or with scientists standing up for what they do. Indeed,
much of Earth Day has always been about science. But, I
always thought that science was the one thing that would not become politicized. But no, we now have a March (also referred to as a Protest) that, while it may have
some good underlying intentions, is being commingled with a political movement and
co-opting Earth Day.
There are many things wrong with this. First, this politicization of Earth Day will
prevent the attendance of many who might otherwise come out to celebrate and
learn about the Earth (and in the process learn about and appreciate science). Earth Day will become just another day to
march or protest for or against some political cause, to chant and scream and to hate
anyone who disagrees with one’s viewpoint on whatever. It will engage some in the now political
cause, but it will also alienate many others.
Earth Day this year is not a day for everyone to come together and
celebrate Earth; rather, it is a day to take political sides.
Beyond my sadness in losing the essence of Earth Day, is my
sadness in losing the objectivity associated with science. When science begins to align itself with or
against one party or another, it loses at a minimum its appearance of
objectivity. Can one really trust the hypotheses
or reasoning of a scientist who is clearly aligned with, perhaps even a
spokesperson for, one particular point of view?
By creating this sort of question, the scientists may be defeating their
own purpose behind the march – to assert the importance of science and its
objectivity. If they create a climate in
which science is open to question for its lack of objectivity, then they have
weakened, not strengthened science.
But, beyond creating the question of objectivity, there is
the deeper question of whether, when one is so personally and deeply involved
in and committed to a particular point of view, that person can in fact be the
independent and objective thinker that science requires. We all, even scientists, are human. Much as we might like to think that we can be
completely objective, we all have beliefs and biases that to some extent affect
our lives. The stronger these beliefs
and commitments, the stronger is their influence. Hence, if one becomes an avid and active believer
and advocate of a particular political view then that will have to in some way
affect that person’s thinking. And, when
that thought is applied to scientific examinations and conclusions it is indeed
possible that the scientific thinking will no longer have the objectivity necessary
to support strong and valid scientific conclusions.
This is not to say that scientists cannot or should not hold
political views or that they should not express those views. But to coalesce themselves into a single
group with a clear political voice biased in one particular way does seem to
interfere in some way with their necessary scientific objectivity.
So, I will miss attending Earth Day celebrations this year;
I do not want to attend a political rally nor do I wish to become involved in a
political protest or debate at what should be a unified celebration of Earth. I hope that next year Earth Day will once
again become a peaceful and apolitical celebration where people of all political
persuasions are welcome and where everyone can come together to share, discuss,
and learn what we can do to protect this wonderful planet that we call home.
No comments:
Post a Comment