Why Shutdowns are Bad for Democracy

No, it is not the mask mandate, although it might be – we don’t know.  And that is one of the problems.

We have governors and now a presumptive president-elect who make proclamations about COVID-19 and masks and shutdowns for political reasons but which are based on half-truths and selected science.  The result is that we are being put into a mental slumber of unthinking in which we accept without question what we are told.

The mainstream news media, which seems to be where most people are getting their information, has an agenda.  That agenda for the last year has been to convince people that President Trump was getting it wrong about COVID-19.  

Government cannot fix everything.  The Trump administration has and with the vaccine continues to put a dent in the virus and our ability to treat those infected, but no government can cure it or make it go away.  Yet Democrats, rather than applaud successful efforts, choose to set up roadblocks and blame the President as if he had created the virus and intentionally set it upon us.  And governors continue to tell us that they would fix everything if only we would obey their dictates.

There are studies supportive of shutdowns and masks, but there are also serious scientific studies that question the usefulness of such measures.  See for example THIS 

Similarly, rather than pay attention to the scientific studies of the effectiveness of the vaccine, the MSM  jumped on the bandwagon when Kamala Harris proclaimed that the vaccine could not be trusted because it was developed during Trump’s presidency.  Now, when we have two vaccines showing 94 and 95 percent effectiveness, the narrative continues that it may not be trustworthy because it was developed during the Trump administration.

And there are the shutdowns and the mask mandates which come and go like the wind and are always riddled with irrational exceptions. 

Let’s remember that last spring we had a 3-week shutdown to SLOW THE SPREAD.  Not to completely eradicate the virus.  We always expected it would continue to be with us.  But now when the numbers go up in the slightest, we have to shut down all over again because apparently somehow we believe that some government official can just make it completely go away if we only do what he or she says.

About those numbers:  generally, the numbers given to justify government mandates are not complete.  Do you know if deaths due to COVID-19 but with underlying conditions were really caused by COVID-19 or by the underlying condition?  How is that determination made?  Are there incentives to count it as COVID-19?

What about infection rates?  Do more tests result in a higher or lower overall infection rate?  What about false positives and false negatives?  How many are there?  Why?  How do they affect the rates?

And the masks.  Did you know there are significant studies by credible scientific groups that deny the effectiveness of masks?  Why do these studies not get equal time?   Did you know that a study performed by the military resulted with a lockdown showing slightly greater infection rate than non-lockdown? (LINK )

Arbitrary and ever-changing shut down and similar rules can and do take a heavy negative toll on the populace.  Not only do small businesses and their employees take the brunt of economic devastation, but also the people in general suffer in ways that many would find worse than the virus. 

The repressive actions by many state governors seem to ignore such things as increased depression and suicide, increased spousal and family abuse, decline of academic and athletic training and skills at K-12 schools and colleges, the loss of a will to live in the elderly isolated in elder care homes, etc.

But far more catastrophic than the individual and specific events that we can point to is the effect that the shutdowns have on the soul of every individual and ultimately of our country as well.

Isolation is not natural for humans.  Sitting at home, even working at home, lacks the stimulation that occurs when we go out into the world.  That stimulation might be talking with a colleague at the coffee machine, or shopping, or having lunch with friends, or discussing any number of topics in a seminar or playing games inside or outside with friends or strangers or any number of the things humans typically do (or did before they were instilled with COVID-19 fear and threatened with lockdowns).

When one is left without real stimulation, with hours of essentially nothing to do except scroll through social media or stream videos on TV, one becomes sluggish in both body and mind.  An inertia sets in.  I can’t help but think of the description of “mental slumber” found in The Golovlyov Family by Saltykov-Shchedrin: “As she gazed she would think of nothing . . . .  She merely gazed and gazed, until a senile drowsiness began to hum in her ears again, veiling the fields, churches, villages and that distant trudging peasant in the mist.”

The Russian word for such inertia is oblomovshchina [Обломовщина] from the character in Goncharov’s Oblomov who spends the whole day just dreaming and lying on the couch.  In his book Dead Souls, Gogol also referred to such “lie-a-beds.”

We have this soul-deadening inertia being cultivated by our various governors and their lockdowns.  It is not healthy for us or for our democracy.

As any good communist, socialist, or Democrat will tell you, “never let a crisis go to waste.”  COVID-19 arriving on our shores was a crisis.  And the Democrats had no intention of letting it go to waste and continue to use it to suit their agenda.

They begin by generating a fear so great that it cripples logical thought.  Now yes, as with any dangerous thing, including a virus, a little fear or caution is a good thing.  But the fear mongering of the media and the left goes far beyond that as they created and continue to promulgate fear that reaches the level of hysteria about the virus. 

With hysteria and its emotional and illogical mates, comes a huge uncertainty.   Humans do not like uncertainty.  They look for something or someone that can provide certainty to their lives.

The state governors and other politicians make it clear that you must listen to them asserting that they are the only ones who have and understand all the information, and, being in a state of fear many people are willing to listen and accept without question.  They think the mandates will provide them the certainty they seek.

They do not question what that information is.  They do not question why it leads to the mandate being imposed.  They do not question what other information is available.  The people just blindly follow, the well instilled fear being that if they do not then they will certainly die. 

The people are learning to follow blind and often inconsistent and irrational mandates.  They are learning to accept what they are told without question.  They are learning to give up their freedom without question.

This does not mean that everything we are told is inaccurate or not useful, but to accept it without question is the very antithesis of democracy. 

Democracy requires a mind that is awake, that is able to question and to seek out all the evidence, that is energized by debate about information and policy.  It requires a soul that believes in itself and is self-reliant and innovative.  

The mental slumber in which the unquestioned mandates place us is the enemy of democracy, of free and fulfilling lives, of the true happiness and health that comes from being in charge of your own soul.

So, yes, COVID-19 is dangerous and even deadly for some.   For others it is less so.   We are human.  We can think.  We can understand the facts and evidence if it is fully provided to us.  We can take the precautions necessary for who we each are and can do what is necessary to help protect our neighbors. 

We do not need mandates that that are filled with holes like a slice of Swiss cheese.  We have minds and it is time that we started to use them, because if not, the “cure” for COVID-19 will be the death of us all.

 

 

CoVid Mission Shift

Doctors and scientists are not and should not act as if they are politicians.  Politicians are not and should not act as if they are doctors.  But that is exactly what is going on with CoVid, and it is a disaster.

Let me begin by saying that I believe CoVid is very real and very dangerous.  It is not the flu.  It may or may not have a death rate similar to the flu.  But its transmission is far different from the flu and it can and does kill, it can and does spread more easily than the flu, and its long term effects are unknown.  Even with a vaccine it will likely be with us forever.

That being said, the shut down hysteria is ridiculous and is based in politics far more than it is in science.

Let’s briefly review.  When the virus first arrived from China we knew nothing about it except that it seemed to spread easily and that it killed people.  People who were severely infected with the virus needed ICU care and ventilators.  We were concerned that there might not be enough beds or ventilators, so, the scientists suggested that we do something to “slow the spread.”

“Slow the spread” never meant eradicate the virus.  It meant try to keep the rate of spread slower than it was so that the hospitals would not be overloaded and we would not run out of ventilators.  A variety of measures were taken to slow the spread in the early spring.  There were major shutdowns. We even provided unemployment bonuses to encourage people not to come to work.  We watched the daily numbers on our TV screens.  We slowed the spread and the threat of overtaxing our resources was eliminated, in part because of the slower spread and in part because of the President’s efforts to join with industry and manufacture ventilators and other needed supplies.

Up to this point, things seemed to make sense given what we knew about the virus.  There were the expected attacks on the President – he acted too fast/too slow in shutting things down, closing entry from infected countries, etc, but for the most part we accomplished the goal.  We slowed the spread and the medical effects of the virus became manageable.

But then something happened.  We had a mission shift.  As people began to venture out, some still got the virus.  The Democrats said Trump was killing people.  The media became hysterical.  The virus was still here.  Somehow, we seemed to think that the “slow the spread” guidelines should have completely rid us of the virus. 

Democrats loved this – they could blame Trump that the virus is still here while at the same time attacking everything he has done.  Their candidate, Hidin’ Biden, could sit in his basement and read prepared critiques while pointing to numbers saying people are still dying.  This of course easily combines with the media’s love for, and talent in, creating hysteria.  As the disease continues to spread the idea of uncertainty is pushed; and, with uncertainty comes not only hysteria, but also a need to blame someone – the media and the Democrats point us to the perfect target – Trump. 

And, what a wonderful campaign tool to be used by a Party that needs to hide its candidate from public scrutiny.  Make Trump and other Republicans out to be unconcerned about the citizenry if they go outside to campaign.  Trump should not have rallies; he should not travel or make presidential appearances.  People should not be allowed to gather at places like conservative churches.  Presidential debates are being rescheduled (and I for one expect that Biden will find a CoVid reason to ultimately cancel).  We must have full mail in voting (which, unlike absentee mailed votes is fraught with the potential for abuse and fraud) because going outside to vote is too risky.  This at the same time as the Democrats have no problems with protestors and rioters gathering in large numbers to assert Progressive demands and attack traditional values as well as public property and private businesses. (New Mexico’s Governor said that door-to-door campaigning “is just a terrible idea in a CoVid world,” while asserting there is “no data linking political protests to outbreaks of the disease.”)  How convenient – Trump and conservative activities bad, Progressive activities good. 

And so we see a variety of ridiculous prohibitions put into place against the backdrop of fear and hysteria over the simple and always expected fact that CoVid is still with us.

How can a governor (NM) order breweries open but bars closed?  Either getting together in a room for a drink heightens the risk of CoVId or it does not.  But, it is a younger, more left leaning crowd that generally frequents breweries.  Why does Ohio require bars to close at 11 – does CoVid suddenly become more aggressive later in the evening?  Why can a professional soccer team in New Mexico continue to play while high school and college soccer are banned?  Why are crowded planes OK but theaters must stay closed?  Why is it OK for Dr. Fauci to remove his mask when sitting next to two other individuals in the baseball stands, but not OK for someone to not wear a mask when they are walking alone on an outside trail?  Why is it OK to gather with or without masks to assault federal property, but not ok to sing a song in church? 

These and many other similar questions suggest that the current shut downs along with the current distancing and mask wearing requirements are more about furthering one or another agenda than serving some medical or scientific purpose.  If masks are necessary to protect us, then orders to wear masks should be without exception.  If bars are a breeding ground for CoVid, then all bars should be fully closed.  The fact that rules that are allegedly to protect the public health are fraught with exceptions belies their stated purpose and strongly suggests a different and likely political purpose instead.

There is no way to fully prevent CoVid, to guarantee that no one will become infected.  That is the fact, and that is the problem.  The media has ginned people up to become hysterical over that fact.  The scientists, some of whom seem to enjoy the limelight, like to make predictions or tell us what they think we should do.  The politicians use data and recommendations selectively to make demands that have nothing to do with CoVid.  And, if the Democrats can, they will keep this going until the election. 

Dr. Fauci yesterday suggested goggles and face shields in addition to masks.  Really?  Are we all going to let them put us in hazmat suits before this is over?  A doctor suggests all sorts of things to prevent risks.  Our doctors tell us what to eat for our heart, our weight, etc.  Sometimes we follow their advice, sometimes we don’t.  Sometimes Leftist politicians try to make those decisions for us (for example, banning large soft drinks).  But we have never let our doctors, in conjunction with our politicians, put us in a bubble. 

A bubble is where we likely need to stay for the rest of our lives if we are to be protected with certainty from CoVid.  But that is also where we need to be if we are to be protected from life’s many dangers – auto accidents, flu, broken bones, being attacked, infecting a loved one with any number of diseases we might contract, etc. 

Until CoVid, we seemed capable of entering life’s ebb and flow based on our own assessments of our own individual circumstances and risks.  Yet, suddenly, our politicians seem to think they must pick and choose when and where we can go, with whom, and what we should wear.  And we let them.  And we fail to see that what they are really doing is putting into place rules and behaviors and laws that in the end have nothing to do with CoVid but with their own policies.  Things like guaranteed minimum wage, guaranteed income, general health care criteria, gun laws, tax bases, school programs, and many other items on political wish lists should not be attached in any way to CoVid.  Nor should efforts to modify or direct individual human behavior and individual choices and decisions about what activities are better or worse.  Efforts to usurp power to control individual behavior should not be allowed without appropriate Constitutional or legislative authority.

Here is what I think.  We need to understand that doctors give ADVICE which they think is in our best interests.  When the doctor is not our personal doctor we must add to that advice and weigh with it our knowledge of our own personal circumstances.  And, added to that and weighed with it is that no doctor or scientist is yet fully knowledgeable about CoVid or its possible effects. 

Doctors along with us need to remember that while they are likely more informed than us about medical issues and about CoVid, that does not make them actually better than us or give them a right to order or control our behavior.

We must also understand that the politicians are not our doctors.  They have their own agendas and the CoVid is simply something that they are using to further those agendas and their own quest for power. 

CoVid is a part of our world and we must learn to live with it, not hide from it.  We must take the precautions that fit our personal circumstances and which we all, as members of a society, can reasonably take as part of our concern for our fellows.  This generally includes a choice to social distance and wear a mask, wash our hands, and avoid others when we are not feeling well.  We can decide for ourselves what venues and gatherings are appropriate to attend or not attend.  We do not need a Big Brother to order our choices for us and we should not suggest that we cede our personal liberties to the State.

Uncertainty is a part of life, and CoVid is now a part of that uncertainty.  We must not let the doctors, the scientists, the politicians, or the media use that uncertainty to divert us from our own ability to act reasonably and make our own decisions.  There is no reason to be hysterical.  CoVid, its risks, and its unknowns are just another part of life’s many uncertainties, uncertainties that our freedoms allow and demand us to navigate on our own.  Seeking relief from those uncertainties by turning our freedom of choice over to others provides only the certainty that we will lose our freedom to be who we are.

 

 

Let’s Be Clear About the Constitution

There is a lot of uncertainty about the coronavirus, and the everchanging statistics and projections that it produces.   Because there is no definitive “right answer” about what we should do, everyone has their own opinion about what we should or should not do. No one can really know what is correct.   That is fine.  What is not fine is that many people seem to have decided that, because there is uncertainty and no definitive answer,  they can simply create their own rules for themselves, disregarding their governors’ restrictions when they do not agree with those restrictions.  (Regarding the rule of law, see my previous post HERE).  

For some reason many seem to think that the Constitution provides them the right to make their own decisions to override legitimately imposed restrictions.  A common assertion at protests against pandemic orders is that the primary reason the Constitution was written was to restrain the government and that to constrain in any way the ability of the citizenry to individually choose how to interact in society is an unconstitutional attack on their “freedom.”  Similarly, there is the assertion that to impose limitations on behavior is some tyrannical form of unconstitutional oppression of individual rights and freedoms.

Nothing could be farther from the truth; such assertions reveal a complete misunderstanding the Constitution, the nature of the governors’ rights and obligations, and what is meant by freedom within our democratic republic. 

I am increasingly troubled by this widespread misunderstanding of our Constitution and our rights that has come to the surface during this pandemic.  Thus, I proceed here to provide a general overview to refresh our memories or to provide an introduction to further study.

First, the preamble to the constitution does not assert or imply that its purpose is to protect you from the government, or that you have the right to ignore laws you do not like, or do whatever you want.  Rather, it states, “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Thus, the purposes, as stated within the document itself are:

               To form a more perfect Union;

               To establish Justice;

               To insure domestic Tranquility;

               To provide for the common defense;

               To promote the general Welfare;

               To secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.

To let each of us do whatever we want without restraint is not included.

Now, looking at the document itself, it serves three main functions.  First, it creates a national government consisting of three branches (legislative, executive, judicial) and provides a system of checks and balances between the three.  Second, it divides power between the federal government and the states.  Third, it protects certain individual liberties of American citizens.

Elaborating slightly on these three functions, I would first note that the three branches of government are:  the executive power which is invested in the President; the legislative power which is given to Congress (House and Senate); and the judicial power which is vested in the Supreme Court and other federal courts created by Congress.  The system of checks and balances between these three branches avoids tyranny of any one branch.

Federalism addresses the second function of dividing power between the federal and state governments.  Powers not delegated to the federal government, nor prohibited to the states, are reserved to the states or to the people.  Those enumerated powers have been interpreted broadly, and, under the supremacy clause of the Constitution federal law is supreme over state law.   The Constitution also limits the powers of the states in relation to one another, such as limiting via the commerce clause the ability to regulate or tax commerce between states and prohibiting states via the privileges and immunities clause from discriminating against citizens of other states. 

The third function, protection of personal liberty of citizens, comes in part from the main body of the Constitution but more familiarly from the first ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights. These amendments were adopted shortly after the adoption of the Constitution itself, in response to states’ concerns about the Constitution’s lack of protections for individual rights.  The protections of these amendments were originally interpreted to apply only against the federal government, but the Supreme Court has since ruled that most of them were made applicable to the states by passage of the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause.  That Amendment also contains the equal protection clause, which protects citizens from discrimination by the states.

The Bill of Rights sets forth specific prohibitions on government power.  They are not a blanket grant to citizens to do what they please.  The bill of rights guarantees certain specific rights to the individual and the ninth amendment specifies that “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”  While the government may not generally infringe on these rights, they are not absolutely protected from all restriction. 

A law allegedly infringing on specific individual rights may be allowed if, after strict scrutiny, it is determined that the law or regulation is necessary to a compelling governmental interest, is narrowly tailored to achieve that compelling purpose, and is the least restrictive means to achieve the purpose.  Essentially, using this test, a constitutional right may be balanced against the government's interest against observance of that right. When such a regulation or its enforcement is challenged we see the operation of the three branches of government and their checks and balances come into play.

So, when a governor of a state enacts a rule which someone believes is unconstitutional, that regulation can be challenged and, using the above criteria may or may not be upheld.  There is nothing in the Constitution or elsewhere that says it is appropriate for an individual who disagrees with a regulation to simply disobey the rule.  That is nothing more than an act of anarchy.  And to assert that the Constitution gives one a right to be an anarchist is ridiculous, just as it is ridiculous for people to proclaim that it is their choice whether to go out or not rather than follow a governor’s stay at home or back to work orders. 

People who disagree with a governor’s orders or who agree with a violator of those orders are not “patriots” when they laud the violator.  These are often the same people who demand that sanctuary cities be penalized for not following the law or that or that sheriffs who do not enforce gun regulations be disciplined.  Yet here they are supporting disregard for or themselves disregarding legitimate pandemic orders.   True patriots would understand that you don’t just enforce laws with which you agree.  They would understand that the freedom we hold so dear in this country is not a freedom to do what ever one wants regardless of what the law requires.

These pandemic restrictions are not tyranny.  They are not destroying the Constitution.  They are simply controversial.  That controversy stems in part because there is so much uncertainty surrounding coronavirus and the many statistics and projections that it produces.  People are afraid of the unknown, so much uncertainty.  The fears are molded by such things as political positions, personal values, news sources and information about the virus and the economy, personal health and economic status, etc. 

With fear comes anger. With anger comes the desire to blame someone, because once you can blame someone for a problem then the problem is no longer really uncertain – it is under someone’s control.  Essentially, if we name the fear, we make it concrete and blamable.  Thus, perhaps, while the uncertainty of the virus itself cannot be removed, governors can be blamed for violating constitutional rights, thus creating a certainty that can be fixed. 

But such blame is false and cannot reverse the uncertainty of how to deal with a pandemic.  It cannot assuage fear.  It cannot provide a definitive answer to what is an uncertain future. It is based upon incomplete reading and faulty understanding of our Constitution and as such does not justify the behavior that it is being used to defend.

It’s fine to have an opinion about what one thinks is the best way to proceed in light of what we do and do not know about coronavirus.  We are going to disagree about that; that is perhaps the one certainty. But we cannot begin acting as if our individual opinions replace our rules of law, providing each of us with our own conflicting governing structures.

In the end, it doesn’t really matter whether we agree or disagree about what are the appropriate restrictions and back to work timelines in response to CoVid-19.  What matters is that the disagreement is shining a light on a far more serious disease that seems to be eroding the very core of our country: a serious lack of understanding of our Constitution and the governing principles that make our country the successful democracy that it is.  When we lose our understanding and respect for this core, we indeed lose our country.

  

Of People, Sacrifice, and Selfishness

I saw a headline that 3 out of 4 Americans say that coronavirus has changed their life.  Unless someone is a hermit, if we are all doing our part against this invisible enemy, shouldn’t that number be 4 out of 4?

The CDC asks us all to stay at home except for essential trips out, to limit group contacts, to practice social distancing.  Certainly that has to change one’s daily life to some extent, even if they have no other connection to the war against coronavirus.  Those people in essential jobs who do go out also must be experiencing differences in their workplaces as well as changes in their lives outside of work.

The CDC issued its 15-day guidelines last Monday.  These were guidelines that everyone in this country was asked to follow, the reason being that if we do so we have a good chance of really slowing the spread of the disease.  The more people that do not follow, the more likely that the epidemic will be worse, infect more people, and last longer.  

We should not have to wait for our governor or other authority figure to mandate compliance with these guidelines.  We should all, selflessly, be following them.  Those people who are part of the greatest generation, or close enough in age to them to have heard their stories of sacrifice, have some understanding of selfless sacrifice for the common good as a way to overcome a threat to a nation.  Apparently, that concept is lost on many others.

Here is some of the selfishness that I see in my community.  First, is the hoarding.  When shelves are restocked, people grab all they can – often enough of a product or food item to last them a year or more.  There is no consideration of their neighbor who might need just one of those items.   And, of course, the more available income one has, the more one can spend on hoarding, which often leaves those less financially able to do without. 

This hoarding also affects the truckers who are crucial to restocking the shelves.  In some places they and their loaded trucks need to be guarded by law enforcement.  This is nuts!   If people would limit themselves to what they need for 2 weeks, then we all could return to the stores in 2 week time periods to get what we need.  But sadly, some people are thinking only of themselves.

I went for a walk in my neighborhood.  People are out walking in groups crunched together on our narrow sidewalks.  These are not family groups who are already together in the same household.  These are friends and neighbors grouped together.  Apparently they don’t understand that any one of them could be an asymptomatic carrier, transmitting the virus to those they are with who could then transmit it to others and they to others.  This is how the virus spreads and what the guidelines and social distancing stop.  It’s a simple concept so I have to wonder if it is not about their lack of understanding, but their lack of care and concern for others.

When non-essential businesses stay open they are not only putting their employees and customers at risk, they are furthering the possibility of community spread to others, including the most vulnerable.  More importantly, they are setting a bad example by encouraging behavior that contradicts the CDC 15 day guidelines. 

I understand that it is devastating for a business, especially a small business to close and lose revenue.  But, in many cases businesses can compensate somewhat by having curbside services as well as increasing on-line commerce.  Even when that is not possible, even when it really hurts, if we don’t all pull together and fully follow the 15 day guidelines, then we are only creating the likelihood that this epidemic will be worse and last longer than it otherwise would. 

Some small businesses understand this.  They know they will take a hit (though the government is now working hard to make that hit far less than it might be).  When one of the Indian Pueblo’s Tribal leaders decided to voluntarily close their casino and other businesses, he stated that it would hurt their bottom line deeply and possibly permanently, but there was no question in his mind that everyone, including him, has a duty to our neighbors and that he would always put people above profits.  Unfortunately, not every business sees it this way and sadly, the bottom line for those that encourage people to come out and patronize them despite the current CDC guidelines is that they are telling us that to them, profits are more important than people. 

Then there are people who just can’t handle giving up their regular routines or pleasures.  The college kids on spring break who say things like “I won’t get it or if I do, so what, I don’t care” show us an ugly and selfish side of humanity:  thinking only of oneself and not others whom their behavior might adversely affect.  It reflects a stunning lack of social consciousness.  And that lack is especially startling when it so frequently comes from those who are always proclaiming the need for things like social justice, concern for those less fortunate, and flat line equality.

But it’s is not just young people.  Senior citizens are often just as reluctant to give up some regularly scheduled social gathering or to alter their routine in any way.  Like some of the young, these elderly do not seem to think that the guidelines should apply to them.  Such thinking is not only ignorant, it is also selfish; there is no excuse for such selfish disregard of guidelines that are for the good of all the people in this nation.

I also want to address the obsessive focus of some on the virus tests.  I understand that people want certainty and that a test confirms that one does or does not have the virus, but only at the moment of the test.  Testing does not lessen the spread or prevent one from getting the virus.  And demanding a test when the current medical and CDC guidelines do not show that one is indicated in a particular individual’s case simply slows down the administration and results for those for whom a test is medically indicated.  The mobile test sites in my area have lines that are miles long.  My guess is that many of these folks are there only seeking some sort of selfish certainty and not because a test for them is medically indicated.

I understand that all of us prefer certainty to uncertainty.  But we must accept that there is no certainty with this virus.  We don’t know how long it will be with us; we don’t know exactly how much our behavior can flatten the curve; we don’t know when or if there will be a cure.  It does no one any good to whine about this or complain that the government isn’t telling us.  Indeed, this administration and its team of experts are being enormously transparent about the information they do have.  They hold daily briefings, as well as other meetings that are live streamed.  I’ve been watching the daily morning news conferences and yesterday I also watched the teleconference with state governors.  Anyone else could do the same.

It is from the experts that we all should be getting our information.  There is, of course, all the false or inaccurate information, the fear mongering, the conspiracy theories, the anti or pro government rhetoric, all sorts of theories and cures and predictions put forth by people who have no actual facts or expertise in the area.  None of this serves to help the situation.  Things like whether or not to call this virus that came to the world from China the Chinese virus in the same way we have named other pandemics or diseases after countries or places of their origin (e.g. Spanish flu, West Nile virus, German Measles, Japanese Encephalitis, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, to name just a few).  Don’t we have more important things to focus on while saving this sniping for after we have won our war against this virus?

While I am proud of the 3 out of 4 who are sacrificing in some way as they follow the guidelines, even if it is simply learning how to chill out alone at home, I am also disheartened by the rest of my countrymen who seem to be presenting a lack of concern, a lot of selfishness, and an inability to sacrifice for the common good.  One out of 4, it can be inferred from that poll, are more selfish than selfless. 

Everyone needs to read the CDC guidelines and educate themselves on the reasoning behind them – why it is so important that everyone – 4 out of 4 – take them seriously and follow them so as to limit to the greatest extent possible this deadly pandemic for which we currently have no vaccine or cure.

When this is all over and we can go out without limitation again, I hope that we all reflect upon what we have learned about ourselves and our neighbors, about this country and its resilience and whether or not we really can all come together for the common good.  We will remember our actions and those of others, for it is actions that speak louder than words.  We will remember whose actions said what.  And we will have the opportunity to take further action to express our feelings about who did what; for example we can go out of our way to patronize businesses that shut down before they were forced to, while remembering differently those that put profit or self-interest above their fellow humankind. 

This is a great opportunity for us all to raise our often-professed social consciousness or patriotism to a new level.  This is an opportunity to us all to realize what it is like to work together for a common good.  As Yoda of Star Wars says, “Do.  Or do not.  There is no try.” The sacrifices we are all asked to make are simple.  As Rosy the Riveter said in WWII– “We can do it!”  So let’s make that number who DO follow the guidelines and alter their behavior a full 4 out of 4 so we can defeat this virus as soon as possible.

We’re All in This Together – Except When We’re Not

COVID-19 is a virus that threatens every person in this country and potentially every person in the world.  While not a visible army, we can very much consider ourselves under attack and the leaders of every country are under an obligation to do the best they can to protect their people.

I happen to think that our President is doing a fantastic job.  He has assembled a team of experts to advise him, led by the very competent Vice President.  President Trump has coordinated and brought together the resources that are available to him, has brought private industry and their innovation and resources into the mix, he has gotten our Congress to begin to work bipartisanly for the good of the people instead of themselves.  The President has acted decisively and quickly and in so doing has likely lessened at least somewhat the spread and effects of the epidemic in this country.  He continues to act as he daily consults with his experts and the new information that they daily gain about the virus.

The President is working for the people of the country.  Many of those people are also working selflessly for their fellow Americans.  And those that are not a part of critical services, those that have been asked to social distance and not go out for non-essential reasons can and should also do their part for America against this invisible enemy.  Many are; sadly, some are not.

This virus can be asymptomatic – a person can have the virus and be able to infect others without feeling any symptoms themselves.  We should all consider ourselves carriers, and the best way to lessen the spread of the virus is for us all, then, to avoid going out in public where we, or our touch on tables, door handles, etc., can possibly spread the virus to others.  To go out, when we do not have to, is to put our fellow Americans at risk.

Yet too many seem to believe that it is about them, not others.  They are not sick, so why not go out.  They think they are healthy and won’t get sick, so why not go out.  There is no concern for the less healthy others who might indeed get sick or die from the virus that they might spread.  The part that most Americans are being asked to play is nothing like the burdens that Americans have suffered together in times of war (ask your parents/grandparents about the second world war!).  We are simply being asked to stay in and away from others as much as possible.  Not a big sacrifice, yet still some are not willing to take it.

For some, it is just a matter of changing their usual social behaviors.  For others – small business people for example, it may be a bigger sacrifice as they close their doors for 2 or 3 weeks, lay off their employees, and lose revenue.  Yes, that is a big deal.  Yet the President and Congress are passing and have passed a series of bills that will in large part alleviate the losses.  This President will forget no one, and we Americans need to trust that he and Congress together will keep us whole.

So, we the people can and should all pull together and each of us do our part for the good of our neighbors and our country.  We need to put self-interest and self-centeredness aside and begin thinking of the many others with whom we are in this together.

But there is another group I would like to address, and that is those who continue to see this as a political goldmine.  First, let me say that I am impressed in the last few days with the bipartisanship that has surfaced in Washington as the Congress and the White House seem to be, for the most part working together.  While realistically I suspect this will not continue once we have won the current war against the virus, I would like to hope that at least  a small part of it will in some way remain and evolve into something both positive and permanent.

But then there are others.  At a time when we need to be working together, I read about a Democrat PAC that plans to spend five million on ads attacking President Trump’s handling of the epidemic even as we are in the middle of the crisis.   When people are already balking or not understanding the need to follow the CDC/White House guidelines which are clearly necessary to attack and slow this virus, why would a group choose to try to make people question the President’s actions that include issuing those guidelines?

This most recent PAC is not alone in its actions.  There are other PACs taking similar actions.  Biden and Sanders have not held back in their attacks on how the President is handling the crisis. And of course the Press, even at the daily White House press briefings, latches onto and furthers these attacks.

There will be plenty of time to attack the President and his actions once this crisis is over.  It will be over a lot sooner if we let the President and his experts continue their thus far effective strategies rather than trying to convince the American people that he is incompetent or doesn’t care about this or them, or whatever lies they are trying to spread.

On NPR this morning they were focusing on problems with testing from weeks ago and letting people complain about the incompetence of the system as if it were today.  To be clear, doctors and experts have emphatically stated that problems with testing at the beginning were not the fault of Trump or the CDC, but of a system in place that did not work for this sort of epidemic.  Since then, the President has revamped the system and partnered with private industry to create quicker and faster tests and make them available to all who need them.  Let’s applaud that rather than whine about a problem that has already been handled.

And, as to those tests, not every single American needs one and if every American demands the certainty of knowing they do/do not have the virus they will only clog the system.  People who need tests can get them.  Let the system work.

The Press often attacks because they get information today that was not given yesterday or perhaps conflicts with earlier information.  Well, the information that we have about the virus is evolving hourly as the experts have more data to analyze and more cases to review.  Trump’s team is doing this, informing him, and hence he has new and sometimes different information to provide.  This is not a bad thing.

But then, if you are Donald Trump, too often in the eyes of the Press you are damned if you do and damned if you don’t.  For example, he was criticized for his early decisive action to stop incoming flights from China.  There is no dispute that this early decisive action greatly reduced the threat in our country.  When he could no longer be criticized for closing the borders, he was then criticized for not doing it soon enough.  Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.  And certainly not helpful in a time of crisis.

Then there are the repeated attacks because the President (and others) call this the Chinese Virus.  Hey, it came from China.  If it came from America it would be an American virus.  Those are facts.  Calling the virus Chinese is not racist, even if there were no other reason for doing so.  But, besides it being a factual statement, it counters a propaganda campaign waged by China that it was American soldiers who brought the virus to China.  It emphasizes the falsity of that Chinese propaganda.  That is not racist and attempts to make it so are simply attempts to divide the country when we should be trying to bring everyone together with the common goal of defeating this viral enemy.

When a country is under attack, when it is at war, it is a time for the people to pull together for the common good and the good of their country.  They become less self-centered and more concerned with the greater good.  Most Americans are doing this now.  But there are those who are not in this together with the rest of us, who simply see this crisis as an opportunity to further their own selfish interests.  While I hope the American people can and will recognize this, that task becomes harder when one of those who is not pulling together but instead participates in the sowing of seeds of dissention is the Press.  We get our information from the Press and its ability to objectively approach and report news is crucial to our ability to understand a crisis and each do our part to help resolve it.

There are those who have been trying to pull this country apart for several years now.  Their continuing such actions in a time of crisis should prove to all that they do not care about our country or any of us, its people, but instead only care about their own agendas and their own power.  They can only hurt us.

But, to the many Americans who do believe that we are all in this together, who are doing their part in our war against the Coronavirus, I applaud you for your sacrifices, be they great or small.  Thank you for understanding the war we are in, for listening to our leaders and experts, for following the guidelines, even as they evolve, and for protecting not only yourself but your neighbors as well.  If we all pull together we will beat this thing sooner rather than later, so let’s just ignore those disrupters who are not in this with us.

What Covid-19 Tells Us About Our Neighbors and Other Thoughts

In watching the reactions of my neighbors and our country to the Corona Virus (its existence, its spread in this country, the way we are handling it, etc.), I realize that it tells me a lot about my fellow citizens.

The first thing that struck me early on was the panic, and the continued fomenting of panic to make the story better.  That, early on, combined with the seeming need of the Democrats to use the virus and the accompanying panic as a new weapon against the President.  When WHO named it a pandemic (a term that simply means "an epidemic that has spread over several countries or continents, usually affecting a large number of people," the panic level increased, as if pandemic meant the end of the world.  WHO by the way is the World Health Organization, and not Who’s on first (since with baseball cancelled no one is on first – but, I digress). 

With the new encouraged panic that came with the label pandemic, and the accompanying attacks on the President for how he was handling it, I couldn’t help but see the words that exist within “pandemic”:  PANIC and DEM.  It sure seemed like an appropriate coincidence that the Dems were using the pandemic to try to foment panic in a way that would hurt the President. 

But, those are politicians, and, truth be told, they seem to be doing a better job at bipartisanship in the last few days.  Though, certainly, they will examine every word of every press conference once this threat has passed in order to find new ammunition against their opponents.

So, let’s look at the regular people.  How did they react?  First, there is the hoarding.  Of ridiculous items like toilet paper –I really don’t understand that.  I can understand buying a  little more soap or hand sanitizer, but what about the woman I watched in my local grocery pull the 7 remaining jars (gallon size I think) of hand sanitizer into her already overloaded basket, and refuse to share with someone who asked if she could have just one?  Why are people hoarding water?  This isn’t a drought.  Perishable foods that would last me 3 months that I know will rot before they are used while someone else who just wanted a week’s worth will go without.  This is not only ridiculous; it is selfish plain and simple.

This selfishness is especially noteworthy due to the fact that many of these same people are the ones who are usually lecturing about our need to take care of those less fortunate than us.  I guess that is fine when you have all you need, but when you think they might have or get something that you want, then it becomes just fine to ignore their pleas.  For so many it is really all about oneself, and I am interpreting this to also mean that the seemingly humanitarian gestures they may make when we are without a pandemic really serve some ulterior selfish motive (the need to have people dependent on oneself, the need to feel superior in one’s ability to “help” someone less fortunate, the general need for power).   

Then there are the variety of guidelines, that are generally put out by the CDC, but required at varying levels by different states.  So many people think these guidelines, or even the state requirements do not apply to them.   Clearly, they do not understand the purpose of the varieties of social distancing that are suggested or required, or if they do, then they are just plain selfish.   They would rather not give up a night out or some other unnecessary pleasure than eliminate the risk that they might carry the virus to someone else.  Yes, one can carry the virus without showing symptoms, and the more places we go the more likely it is that we will come into contact with the virus and potentially carry it to another.   Each one of us should really think of ourselves as a carrier, and we should understand that it is not about our selfishly not missing some nonessential event, but about us protecting our fellow humans – our neighbors.  Yes, the social distancing protects oneself, but it also protects our fellow citizens.

Another thing that stands out to me is the inability of many people to deal with uncertainty.  This virus and our knowledge of it is ever evolving and so there really are no certain answers.  This does not sit well with many; they become angry, they think they are being lied to (“you said that yesterday, but today you say this”), they attack, and then they think they can just ignore everything.

I have recently been watching the daily White House briefings on the virus.  First, I would argue that the President and his team of experts are doing an amazing job.  Probably not perfect (I’m sure the Democrats will analyze even the slightest imperfections to death once this is over), but they are balancing reality with possible panicked overreaction or over limitation on our freedoms.  As is appropriate, they leave the extent of requirement and enforcement to state governors who can assess the particular threats within their state.  And, because the knowledge base about the virus is ever evolving, their statements and recommendations likewise evolve and may even contradict earlier statements.  This makes sense, yet some of the press chooses to use their questions to attack/find fault with this instead.

Yes, we want answers.  Definitive answers.  How long?  How many?  Can I plan something for April?  Can I go to a movie?  With how many friends?  The answers today will likely be different tomorrow.  We must live with this uncertainty as we work to understand and get the virus under control.  Rather than anger, let’s listen to the experts and try to follow their advice – for the good of both ourselves and our fellow Americans.

The President and his team issue guidelines – today a 15 day critical list – which they ASK Americans to follow for the benefit not only of themselves but of their fellow citizens as well.  These, according to the experts, can drastically slow the spread of the virus.  They are not difficult to follow.  They will probably change in 15 days.  Yes, people will need to alter their routines, forego some of their usual activities, but they are nothing like the wartime rationing or the like that our parents and grandparents suffered as they all pulled together for the good of their country.

Rather than complain about the hardships of being asked to stay home for a while, I wish that people would perhaps use that time to educate themselves about this virus and think about how they can do their part for the good of our country rather than whine about what they themselves cannot do.

As a start in that education process here are two links.

The first is to the White House 15 day guidelines issued today.  This 2 page document explains how you can do your part to slow the spread of the virus:  GUIDELINES 

The second link is to an interactive article from the Washington Post that explains why “flattening the curve” of the outbreak is so important and how different levels of social distancing can affect that.  FLATTENING THE CURVE 

I finally note that many people are doing all they can for all of us:  the President and his team, the bipartisan efforts from Congress, the private industries that have stepped up, the individuals who are helping their neighbors, and most importantly, our health care workers who are that thin white line of defense on which we all depend.  So many people, from the President to the local janitor who is keeping things sanitized, are working selflessly for America and its people.  Let’s all get behind them and help to minimize the destruction that this virus will cause.