A narrative is a story.
Synonyms include such words as “account,” “tale,” and even “lie.” Dictionary definitions include the following:
“a story or account of events, experiences, or the like, whether true or
fictitious”; “a story that connects and explains a carefully selected set of
supposedly true events, experiences, or the like, intended to support a
particular viewpoint or thesis.”
Just to be clear, narrative may or may not be factual.
Narrative is often used as a form of persuasion. One creates a compelling story that
encourages its audience to react in a particular way. The story may or may not be based in fact. Narratives can be entertaining, they can be
useful, and they can be a dangerous form of propaganda.
We currently see narrative functioning at its most dangerous
every day on the news; that is, if we can see beyond the story created we will see the narrative for what it is. For, what passes for “news” today is actually a mixture of fact,
innuendo, and fiction composed to create a view of the world that fits into an agenda;
it is an attempt to form our views about leaders and policies in a way that fit
a purpose that encourages the audience to act in a certain way towards those
leaders and policies. This is not news,
it is propaganda. That it is passed off
and often also accepted as a rendition of fact rather than a carefully crafted
narrative is dangerous indeed. For if
people act and react based on a false rendition of reality the result is often
unfair or unjust, likely destructive, and surely unproductive.
There is a very sinister use of narrative by many on the
Left who, in conjunction with members of the media, set forth a narrative about
the current administration that is completely negative. They are creating their own story – the story
they want to be true – regardless of its factual support or lack thereof. The goal of this narrative is to urge anyone
who hears it to join their efforts to bring down this administration. Their narrative is powerful, but, often, not
factual.
Yet, facts do matter.
There must be a realistic and factual appraisal of any existing
situation before people can work to improve it.
Competing narratives prevent meaningful dialog and preclude a joint
focus on what is. Without facts there
can be no rational dialog; rather, dialog will be guided by emotions generated
by the narrative being told. Rather
than informed, intellectual debates about issues, those issues will be decided
by whomever is best able to manipulate others by creating the more persuasive
narrative, regardless of its truth.
There is a difference between interpreting actual and
existing facts and simply creating your own.
Facts are always open to interpretation and discussion. Interpretations of facts – their significance,
whether they are good or bad, their cause and their effect - may change. But the facts themselves do not change; they
are not fluid. Narratives, on the other
hand, have a fluidity that can be useful to their creators; since they need not
be factual, the story can change at will in order to create the effect desired
by the narrative’s creator. When such
narratives are taken as fact then reality itself becomes fluid and we are all
left to the mercy of the one who can create the best narrative. This is a very dangerous place to be since
the motives underlying the creation of any particular narrative may be less
than kind, and may be sinister indeed.
And, when narratives succeed, their creators, feeling a
heady and dangerous sense of power, are likely to continue to use that tactic
to their benefit again in the future. Suppose
the anti-Trump narrative succeeds in removing Trump from office. What is to prevent a new narrative being
constructed to remove his successor, then his successor and so on? The dangerous result is nothing less than a
loss of our democracy.
Yet, narratives are only as powerful as their audience allows
them to be. Today, when narratives with little or no basis in fact are
competing for control of our country, we must all become extra vigilant. We must demand facts and expose narratives. If we continue to allow the blurring of
the lines between fact, fiction, and opinion we will be participating in
creating a culture that is intellectually bankrupt and continually at war with
its own reality. If we instead
choose to take narratives for the stories they are, if we demand facts and
distinguish those facts from opinion and fiction, we can create a culture where
we will be able to have intellectual, rational, and productive discussions
about existing facts and their meaning because we will all be living in and a
part of the same reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment